Alan March wrote: We dont hide the issue, its shown in the measurements on the product page We show -46db / 0.5% However we agreed with Purifi a be...

Alan March wrote: Did it? Show me the measurements to prove it. Show me a simple, on front axis, direct comparison between the two speaker samples ...

Alan March wrote: Right, so you cant actually demonstrate that there is a significant difference between the two speaker samples Yeah I can’t demons...

Alan March wrote: ....mmmmm....... The nearfield PR measurements are not relevant and very easily made different by very small changes in distance to...

Alan March wrote: Its not what I asked for. we need to see the measurement at 1m from the front of the speaker for both sample A and B. I can only ...

Alan March wrote: The Purezza is a different design with a different PR and a not very flat low frequency response. He hasnt properly corrected the b...

Alan March wrote: Thats the PR measurements. What about a 1m on front axis for A and B? First picture is it. To compare I uploaded PR response too...

Alan March wrote: Can you show me? This is it.

Alan March wrote: Yes, I agree. if you completely filled the speaker with sand you could probably block it further 😉 but that would spoil the box t...

Alan March wrote: You dont listen at the PR. I said that it looks like 1M measurement.

Alan March wrote: You dont listen at the PR. Yes I don’t listen at PR, but 400Hz can be dispersed as omnidirection as the Sointuva’s baffle width.

Jason K wrote: That was nearfield measurement of woofer. In front of the woofer 1cm. They looks clean enough. But when the reviewer measured in front ...

Alan March wrote: Hang on a minute, lets look at the plots of speaker A and Speaker B What massive difference is seen? Can you show the differen...

Here is another Purifi speaker sample. Selah Audio Purezza. I can see the problematic distortion around 400Hz at 97dB. It reachs to -45dB like Sam...

Alan March wrote: Lets get real about this. The distortion is only at about 0.05% !!!!!!! I understand it is typo, 0.05% is about -65dB. They looks ...